American Idol, Lesbian & Gay Music & Hollywood

Like many others, Adam Lambert’s loss on Tuesday spurred thoughts about eyeliner, gayness and cultural acceptance. Two friends commented that they “were not surprised, just as they would not have been surprised but were disappointed, as they would have been if McCain had won the Presidential Election.

 My own cynical response was, thank God he doesn’t have to crow that he’s going to Disney World and Lambert doesn’t have to sit on the hood of Ford’s latest model and shill. However, seeing a guy in blue eyeliner posed across the hood of the car a la Michelle Pfeiffer in the Fabulous Baker Boys would have been a cultural watershed!

My friends clearly thought Adam lost due to his image vis-a-vis Kris Allen’s Middle America, teenybopper appeal. Republican strategist Todd Harris went on CBS’s The Early Show the day before the vote and framed it in terms of red and blue states. He argued that “You’ve got these more liberal elites who live on each coast, represented by Adam, and then Kris represents what those on the coast refer to as the flyover states.”

 This response made me more intrigued by Out Magazine editor’s Aaron Hicklin’s opinion piece in the Washington Post’s Sunday section this morning. Hicklin noted the continued existence of the closet in the worlds of Hollywood and in the entertainment worlds. Certainly, there is significant truth to this. Despite the actions of Ellen Degeneres and Rupert Everett (who he does not mention) and Clay Aiken and Elton John in the music sphere, there are limits to the number of people who have exited the closet and some real and perceived constraints constructed by both of these industries (note the homophobic questions that James Franco faced about men kissing in Milk when he appeared on talk shows.)

However, I was disappointed by the article for a few reasons. With this platform, why not take the opportunity to discuss some of the many people in the industries who are out? Rufus Wainwright and Pansy Division may lead the parade, but check out this website.

What does consistent focus on repression and oppression symbolized by the closet do to readers? Wouldn’t a focus on this variety of out performers found on the above website actually provide new and informative news to that audience?

I thought the article’s reference to politicians such as Larry Craig, was an intriguing link about the Hollywood and Washington closets. However, it also made me think we need to be careful about who we consider gay, lesbian, queer, and someone who has sex with a member of the same sex. Doesn’t a person have to embrace the culture and lifestyle of queer to be queer? Similarly, to be lesbian, gay or bisexual? Isn’t such an acceptance a critical component of being and significantly different from craving a sexual activity with a person of your sex?


3 comments so far

  1. […] Original post by bla2222 […]

  2. Mari on

    Okay, I haven’t been really following AI because there are other more interesting things on TV and via Netflix. But the theory I heard was the other guy was more pop and Adam was more and consistantly glam-rock. From a purely business perspective I’d pick the more middle of the road safe bet. I thought Adam would win, but it’s Ruben Studdard vs Clay Aiken all over again, cute white boy you can sell to teenie-boppers vs big black guy.

    • bla2222 on

      I agree with you. I was tired of hearing the whine about the closet when we could be talking about the positive. It’s like the Civil Rights Era folks who don’t speak about how much good change has occurred.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: