Archive for the ‘labor’ Tag

Behind Major League Baseball’s Top Teams

A damning analysis of the Astros being very cheap negotiating with their players: Certainly part of corporate attempts to maximize profits and lower labor costs which are happening throughout the United States

I’m surprised that the MLB union, which is the strongest among professional sports, has not been fighting harder for these players.

Astros exemplify the player-unfriendly bent of analytics


Scott Walker Gets It

Even if you care not one whit about sports, this is pricelessly ironic: anti-union Governor calls for return of union referees.

Hey Governor, maybe now you can see that union workers are the best at what they do!!!

Stop your fights with the teachers, policemen, firemen, ambulence EMTs and other government workers. Let people join together and bargain collectively. For God’s sake, let people earn a living that they can actually live off of instead of having to work two jobs and sacrifice in a variety of ways.

NBA Labor-Owner Battle

A few good sources on the details behind the NBA struggle.

Are there ten teams losing money as the players say, or 22 out of 30 losing money as the owners say? The total revenue that the league makes is $4 billion. They have to get together to decide how to split that much money up. The only group more pathetic is the NFL which can’t decide how to split up $9 billion. Greed is good????

Does the NBA need all these teams and does it need to have an 82 game season. Fans get bored and the players do too. But the owners say they need all the games and teams to make as much money as the league does. Ever hear of too much of a good thing? Players don’t want to cut the number of teams because they would lose jobs. Still, who wants to pay $150 for a ticket to see two teams sleepwalk through a game?

Players, whose average salary is around $5 million, currently get 57 percent of the annual revenue; the owners want to increase to $900 million the amount they get off the top and a 50-50 split of the remainder. This would reduce the players’ share to about $2 billion or nearly $100 million less than now.

Stephen A. Smith notes:

The players are interested in giving back $100 million in salaries over the next five years, not $800 million annually over the next 10 years. They’re interested in reducing their level of basketball-related income from 57 percent to 54.3 percent, not giving back 25-40 percent of revenue yearly over the life of the agreement.

Like any players’ association, NBA players are not interested in entertaining a hard salary cap. Nor are they interested in listening to league officials who call it a Flex Tax. And they’re not interested in having the maximum limit on guaranteed deals reduced from 5-6 years to three years, either.

“We’re not the ones who have a problem with the agreement we presently have,” Hunter said. “We’re sensitive to what league owners are telling us. We understand we’re living in a different time and we hear what they’re saying about adjustments that need to me made. But when you’re approximately $7 billion apart, when you haven’t moved for months, and you’ve spent years threatening to take us to this point, it is what it is.

Jason Whitlock argues intriguingly the following:

The game of professional basketball is strong. The product is good. Other than the tatts, the players have done an excellent job of repairing their image.

The owners have not handled their business. They want to take money back from the players and lock them into a bad long-term deal to pay for the league’s failing business ventures such as the WNBA, NBDL, NBATV, Eddy Curry, Gilbert Arenas, etc.

If players gave and make concessions these need to come with some guarantees on the owners’ side. Such as making sure that the money is spent on the team and not put into owners’ pockets. Just ask baseball owners where they are putting the monies that they got from big spending teams through the luxury tax.

BLAGOJEVICH Detroit and Wall Street

The imbalance in the treatment between Wall Street and the UAW and car companies is now being referenced in a few places
I heard Mark Shields go to town on the bashing of blue collar workers while the white collar Wall Street execs continue to do very well on last Friday’s Inside Washington.  He even doubts that they are still the party of the workers.

Buddies of mine and I have long given up hope on either party representing the interests of workers, who are working two and three jobs and still taking out thousands of dollars in credit card debt to attempt to live like they did years ago (middle class).